您的一票代表什么
如果不获通过
不获通过则一切维持不变
如果第39号提案未通过，投票规则维持不变。立法分析师（LAO）说，亲自投票的选民通常在名单上签名。官员一般不核对这些签名，但会核对邮寄选票信封上的签名。 3
为何现在出现在选票上
资金
由谁承担费用
谁在背后
支持来自哪里
根据背书者和出资者来定位，而非根据我们的意见。 我们如何定位提案
加州共和党和Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association建议对第39号提案投赞成票，加州民主党则建议投反对票。民权团体ACLU of Northern California、劳工组织California Teachers Association和League of Women Voters of California也反对此提案。支持第39号提案的委员会的最大捐款者是Richard Uihlein和Joseph Gebbia。反对此提案的委员会的最大捐款者是加州民主党和The Tribal Council of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria。 786911101213
背书
追踪资金
赞成主要捐款者
- Richard UihleinUS$1700万
这是谁？
- Joseph GebbiaUS$800万
这是谁？
- Reform California with Carl De Maio - Ballot Measure CommitteeUS$316.1万
这是谁？
- Nicole ShanahanUS$37万
这是谁？
- Perfect One CapitalUS$30万
- Cameron WinklevossUS$25万
这是谁？
- Tyler WinklevossUS$25万
这是谁？
- Stark Industrial LLCUS$25万
- Douglas LeoneUS$25万
这是谁？
- Aubrey ChernickUS$15万
这是谁？
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的79%。
- 81%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$188万
委员会: Californians for Voter ID, Yes on 39
反对主要捐款者
- California Democratic PartyUS$613.5万
- The Tribal Council of the Federated Indians of Graton RancheriaUS$197.5万
- M. Quinn DelaneyUS$149.1万
这是谁？
Quinn Delaney 是房地产投资人，也是慈善家。 1
- Patty QuillinUS$149.1万
这是谁？
- California Nurses Association Initiative PACUS$108.5万
- SEIU California State Council for Working PeopleUS$105.8万
- California Teachers Association/
Issues PACUS$98.7万 这是谁？
California Teachers Association的Issues PAC。该协会是总部设于加州伯灵盖姆的教师工会，拥有超过30万名会员。 1
- Dignity CA Service Employees International Union SEIU Local 2015US$98.7万
- Reed HastingsUS$98.7万
这是谁？
- Committee to Engage and Empower California VotersUS$79.2万
这是谁？
一个加州委员会。该委员会表示，它成立于2020年，目的是让新选民登记，并给他们投票所需的工具。 1
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的39%。
- 6%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$20.4万
委员会: Black Californians for Thriving Communities-Yes on Prop 3, No on Props 39 & 43, Sponsored by California Black Power Network Action Fund; Californians for Yes on 3 and No on 39, Sponsored by California Immigrants in Action; Citizens for a Just California - No on 39, Sponsored by Higher Wages Lower Rent Alliance; Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund; No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic Organziations; No on Prop 39 - Californians for Voting Rights, Sponsored by California Donor Table & ACLU of Northern California; No on Prop 39 - VoteRiders Committee; United Against Prop. 39 - - Stop the Rig Sponsored by Nonprofit Labor and Civil Rights Organizations; Working Families for a Better Central Coast- Yes on Prop 3, No on Prop 39, Sponsored by Unidos 805 Action Fund; Working People in Supporting of Prop 3 and in Opposition of Prop 39, 43 and 45, Sponsored by Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO
- Californians for Voter ID, Yes on 39: added $73,500 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $1,879,893, mostly by: Reform California with Carl DeMaio - Ballot Measure Committee $1,611,559; REPUBLICAN PARTY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY $105,488; Assembly Member David Tangipa for California - Ballot Measure Committee $72,744. Separate from total_raised.
- Citizens for a Just California - No on 39, Sponsored by Higher Wages Lower Rent Alliance (FPPC 1497488) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $50,000 of its $100,000 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (50%).
- Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund (FPPC 1496598) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $1,164,062 of its $2,412,491 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (48%).
- No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic Organziations (FPPC 1493991) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $19,820,078 of its $20,074,382 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (99%).
- No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic Organziations: added $996,177 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- No on Prop 39 - Californians for Voting Rights, Sponsored by California Donor Table & ACLU of Northern California (FPPC 1489007) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $4,809,410 of its $4,839,060 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (99%).
- No on Prop 39 - Californians for Voting Rights, Sponsored by California Donor Table & ACLU of Northern California: added $9,747 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- United Against Prop. 39 - - Stop the Rig Sponsored by Nonprofit Labor and Civil Rights Organizations (FPPC 1495206) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $7,051,189 of its $12,995,661 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (54%).
- NO side: $3,748,350 given by one committee on this side to another was counted once.
- NO side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $203,887, mostly by: Faith Votes, Sponsored by PICO California Action Fund $88,183; Committee to Save Our Neighborhoods, Sponsored by Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action $56,500; CALIFORNIA FOR ALL OF US - MCKINNOR BALLOT MEASURE COMMITTEE $14,850. Separate from total_raised.
- Committee totals are the Secretary of State's per-measure 'Total Reported Contributions' through 2026-10-22 (secretary of state page), plus later 24-hour reports from the Cal-Access bulk export built 2026-10-28. Donors, geography and independent expenditures come from the itemized Cal-Access filings. Contributions to committees that back several measures are credited pro rata to the share the Secretary of State assigns to this measure.
- Source cutoff: the Cal-Access export used was built 2026-10-27 (UTC) and the Secretary of State's per-measure totals run through 2026-10-22. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Money given to a committee by another committee is shown as that committee, not the money's original source (e.g. a union's issues PAC, not its members). Donor type is inferred from the name; check the filing for sponsors.
资料来源: CA Secretary of State: Proposition 39 contribution totals · Cal-Access raw campaign finance data export · FPPC Top 10 Contributors, November 2026 General Election
支持与反对的最有力论点
双方各自最有力的论点，按其支持者的说法撰写。两者都不代表我们的观点。
支持的最有力论点
支持者包括Transparency Foundation、拉丁美洲裔美国人政治协会（Latino American Political Association）、Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association和加州妇女领袖协会（California Women's Leadership Association）。他们说，选民身份证明将建立对选举的信任，并得到民主党、独立和共和党选民的支持。他们说，邮寄选票会保留，任何选民都可以获得免费身份证。他们认为，目前的签名核对很慢，可能导致选票不被计算。他们说，在上次选举中，有超过10万张选票因签名不符而被拒绝。支持者说，第39号提案提高选民名单的准确性，并要求进行独立审计；LAO说，它可能意味着登记选民减少，例如通过移除不符合资格的选民，或移除没有政府身份证明的符合资格选民。他们也说，实行选民身份证明的州并未出现投票率下降。 143
反对的最有力论点
反对者包括ACLU California Action、Common Cause、League of Women Voters of California和美国参议员Alex Padilla。他们说，信封上一个数字写错就可能使有效选票作废。邮寄投票的选民必须选定一种身份证明；反对者说，否则他们可能根本收不到邮寄选票。他们说，“免费”身份证需要付出交通、请假和文书工作的代价；老年人、学生、低收入工作者、有色人种选民和婚后改名的女性受影响最大。他们说，官员已经在核实选民；LAO说，邮寄选票的签名会被核对，但亲自投票的一般不会。反对者说，在这类规定下，得克萨斯州作废的邮寄选票是加州的12倍；它每年可能花费数亿美元，而且信封上的身份证号码有身份盗窃的风险。他们将它与特朗普（Trump）的选举说法联系起来。 143
资料来源
本页每项事实都连结至以下其中一个来源。
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 39 (en edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3, 8
- Proposition 39: Official Title and Summary (prepared by the Attorney General), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1
- Proposition 39: Analysis by the Legislative Analyst, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-4
- Proposition 39: Arguments and rebuttals, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 5-6
- Proposition 39: Text of Proposed Law, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-2
- California Democratic Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Republican Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- ACLU of Northern California: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of California: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Teachers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop 39: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-26 (compiled by this guide from CA Secretary of State: Proposition 39 contribution totals; data/money/ca-2026-11-p39.json, main@0dcbec8)