您的一票代表什么
如果不获通过
不获通过则一切维持不变
如果第45号提案未通过，现行的环境审查规则维持不变。立法分析师（LAO）说，各机构现在会在批准项目前研究它对环境的影响。如果人们认为机构违反规则，可以提起诉讼。 3
为何现在出现在选票上
一项名为《加州环境质量法》（CEQA）的州法律规定，机构在批准项目之前，必须考虑该项目可能如何损害环境。 3
机构必须征求并考虑公众意见，设有最短意见期，但没有最长期限。对于申请人选择采用新程序的符合资格项目，该议案将为意见期设定上限，并将部落咨询限于联邦承认的部落。 3
如果人们认为某机构没有遵守CEQA，可以提起诉讼。如果法院同意，它可以叫停整个项目，并要求该机构解决问题。 3
大多数项目不需要详细的环境影响报告，而且部分靠近公共交通的住房获得豁免。许多项目还需要其他许可证，而机构可以多次要求提供更多资料或作出更改。 3
该议案的立法认定（为该议案辩护）说，加州审批必要项目的制度“太慢、太官僚，而且成本太高”，而延误会提高“生活成本”。 5
资金
立法分析师说，最初的州和地方费用每年很可能达到数千万美元的高位区间，甚至可能超过1亿美元，部分由收费支付。较长期的影响，无论是正面还是负面，都不确定，但可能更大。最新申报总额请参阅资金图表。 3
- 金额
- 最初每年很可能达到数千万美元的高位区间，甚至可能超过1亿美元
- 为期多久
- 没有结束日期；最初几年费用很可能较高
- 由谁支付
- LAO说，州和地方政府（包括州法院）在最初几年很可能会支付较高的费用。项目申请人和提起诉讼的人所缴付的费用将支付其中一部分。它说，之后，部分费用可能会持续，但诉讼减少可能会降低机构和法院的费用。如果公共项目建得更快，政府的项目费用很可能会较低，而更多完成的项目可能会增加税收。但批准原本不会出现、具有负面环境影响的项目，可能会增加机构应对的费用。 3
由谁承担费用
谁在背后
支持来自哪里
根据背书者和出资者来定位，而非根据我们的意见。 我们如何定位提案
加州共和党和纳税人团体Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association建议对第45号提案投赞成票，加州民主党则建议投反对票。倡议团体GrowSF和商业团体San Francisco Chamber of Commerce也支持此提案，而倡导良好施政的团体League of Women Voters of California和旧金山绿党则反对。支持第45号提案的委员会的最大捐款者是Building A Better California和CA Business PAC。反对此提案的委员会的最大捐款者是Wendy Schmidt和Clean and Healthy California, Sponsored By Environmental Organizations。 10119671281314
背书
追踪资金
赞成主要捐款者
- Building A Better CaliforniaUS$791.2万
这是谁？
- CA Business PACUS$308.6万
这是谁？
California Chamber of Commerce 的政治委员会，该商会是一个商业团体。Times of San Diego 的一则报道称它是 CalChamber 的 Business PAC。 1
利害关系
根据公开记录，并非捐款者本身的解释。
- California Building Industry AssociationUS$256.3万
- PG&E Corporation And Affiliated EntitiesUS$240万
这是谁？
PG&E Corporation拥有总部设于奥克兰的Pacific Gas and Electric。它向北加州520万户家庭供应天然气和电力。 1
- California Association Of RealtorsUS$118.7万
- Building Industry Association Of Southern California, Inc.US$90万
这是谁？
- Lennar CorporationUS$73.8万
这是谁？
总部位于佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德郡（Miami-Dade County）的住宅建筑公司。它也提供抵押贷款、产权和保险服务。 1
- SempraUS$68.7万
这是谁？
Sempra在得克萨斯州和加州拥有公用事业公司，包括San Diego Gas & Electric。其网站说，这些公司服务约4,000万名消费者。 1
- PG&E Corporation And Affilaite EntitiesUS$50万
这是谁？
PG&E Corporation拥有总部设于奥克兰的Pacific Gas and Electric。它向北加州520万户家庭供应天然气和电力。 1
- Bloom Energy CorporationUS$44.8万
这是谁？
设计并制造燃料电池的公司，燃料电池可在现场发电。总部位于加州圣何塞。 1
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的55%。
- 4%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$8.5万
委员会: Building Industry Association of Southern California Issues PAC - Yes on 45; Building Resilient Infrastructure for a Decarbonized Green Economy Issues PAC (BRIDGE Issues) Yes on Prop 45, Funded by PG&E Corporation; California Building Industry Association Issues Committee Supporting Proposition 45; Yes on 45 - Building a More Affordable California, a Coalition of Water, Affordable Housing, Clean Energy, Small Business, Healthcare & Community Leaders
反对主要捐款者
- Wendy SchmidtUS$1000万
- Clean and Healthy California, Sponsored By Environmental OrganizationsUS$712.9万
这是谁？
一个政治委员会。Press Democrat的一篇报道称它为环保PAC。 1
- California State Council of Laborers Issues PACUS$152.7万
这是谁？
这个PAC以California State Council of Laborers命名。一名候选人的网站说，该理事会代表超过7万名工会建筑工人，是LiUNA的政治发声者。 1
- Members' Voice of the State Building and Construction Trades Council of CaliforniaUS$122.6万
- Disctrict Council of Iron Workers of the State of California VicinityUS$99.5万
这是谁？
捐款者的说法
该理事会会长 Dave Osborne 说，第45号提案会“剥夺加州每个家庭确保在其社区兴建的项目安全的权利”。 3
- International Union of Operating Engineers Local 12US$99.5万
这是谁？
International Union of Operating Engineers 的 Local 12。它在南加州和南内华达州设有学徒培训场所。 1
- Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 Issues Advocacy/
Ballot Initiative PACUS$99.5万 - Southern California District Council of Laborers Issues PACUS$99.5万
这是谁？
以南加州劳工工会（Laborers）区域理事会命名的委员会。Rebuild SoCal Partnership的网站说，该理事会有14个附属地方工会。 1
- State Building and Construction Trades Council of California Independent Expenditure PACUS$82.4万
- Kat TaylorUS$50万
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的68%。
- 3%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$7.7万
委员会: Campaign for People Over Polluters, No on Prop. 45, Sponsored by Environmental & Healthcare Organizations; No on Prop 45 - Protect California Communities; No on Prop 45, Sponsored by Labor, Health and Environmental Organizations; No on Prop. 45, SMART Local 105 PAC; Working People in Supporting of Prop 3 and in Opposition of Prop 39, 43 and 45, Sponsored by Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO
- California Building Industry Association Issues Committee Supporting Proposition 45 (FPPC 1353866) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $7,009,737 of its $10,196,208 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (69%).
- California Building Industry Association Issues Committee Supporting Proposition 45: added $186,791 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- Yes on 45 - Building a More Affordable California, a Coalition of Water, Affordable Housing, Clean Energy, Small Business, Healthcare & Community Leaders (FPPC 1484853) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $28,230,874 of its $35,682,874 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (79%).
- Yes on 45 - Building a More Affordable California, a Coalition of Water, Affordable Housing, Clean Energy, Small Business, Healthcare & Community Leaders: added $912,010 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- YES side: $8,253,433 given by one committee on this side to another was counted once.
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $84,899, mostly by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS $75,000; Reform California with Carl DeMaio - Ballot Measure Committee $8,000; REPUBLICAN PARTY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY $1,899. Separate from total_raised.
- Campaign for People Over Polluters, No on Prop. 45, Sponsored by Environmental & Healthcare Organizations (FPPC 1493079) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $1,880,513 of its $9,623,396 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (20%).
- Campaign for People Over Polluters, No on Prop. 45, Sponsored by Environmental & Healthcare Organizations: added $2,220,000 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- No on Prop 45 - Protect California Communities (FPPC 1479255) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $9,421,588 of its $9,471,866 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (99%).
- No on Prop 45 - Protect California Communities: added $100,000 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- No on Prop 45, Sponsored by Labor, Health and Environmental Organizations: added $1,201 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- NO side: $2,985,120 given by one committee on this side to another was counted once.
- NO side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $77,399, mostly by: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 11 Political Action Committee $50,000; Senator Menjivar Ballot Measure Committee $8,886; Million Voter Project Action Fund, Sponsored by Social Justice Organizations $5,299. Separate from total_raised.
- Committee totals are the Secretary of State's per-measure 'Total Reported Contributions' through 2026-10-22 (secretary of state page), plus later 24-hour reports from the Cal-Access bulk export built 2026-10-28. Donors, geography and independent expenditures come from the itemized Cal-Access filings. Contributions to committees that back several measures are credited pro rata to the share the Secretary of State assigns to this measure.
- Source cutoff: the Cal-Access export used was built 2026-10-27 (UTC) and the Secretary of State's per-measure totals run through 2026-10-22. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Money given to a committee by another committee is shown as that committee, not the money's original source (e.g. a union's issues PAC, not its members). Donor type is inferred from the name; check the filing for sponsors.
资料来源: CA Secretary of State: Proposition 45 contribution totals · Cal-Access raw campaign finance data export · FPPC Top 10 Contributors, November 2026 General Election
支持与反对的最有力论点
双方各自最有力的论点，按其支持者的说法撰写。两者都不代表我们的观点。
支持的最有力论点
选票标签上列出的支持者包括加州儿童医院协会（California Children's Hospital Association）、加州水务协会（California Water Association）和加州可负担住房委员会（California Council for Affordable Housing）。他们说，延误、繁文缛节和“无理的诉讼”阻碍了需要的项目，并提高了生活成本。支持者认为，第45号提案设定了“可执行的时间表”，以及更快、更可预测的法律挑战程序。他们说，许可延误使一栋新房屋的成本增加超过7.5万美元，并说第45号提案“将有助降低租金和房贷”。他们认为，它有助降低电费，并有助项目按时、按预算完成。支持者说，它“并不豁免任何一个项目的环境审查”。他们说，市和县保留“批准或拒绝项目的全部权力”，而且“居民保有有意义的发言权”。 14
反对的最有力论点
选票标签上列出的反对者包括清洁空气联盟（Coalition for Clean Air）、CA Environmental Voters、Physicians for Social Responsibility, LA和全国野生动物联合会（National Wildlife Federation）。他们说，第45号提案限制对重大新项目的环境审查，以及“公众发表意见的权利”。反对者认为，它减少了机构考虑公众意见的责任，他们说，这些意见往往揭露“空气和水的潜在污染”。他们说，审查减弱意味着住宅和学校附近有更多污染，以及更多哮喘。反对者认为，它并不要求任何项目降低租金、房贷或水电费。他们说，它给予开发商挑战市和县的新权利，同时使项目反对者更难成功挑战机构的决定。他们认为，当污染者不清理时，由纳税人和公用事业用户付费。 14
资料来源
本页每项事实都连结至以下其中一个来源。
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 45 (en edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3, 11
- Proposition 45: Official Title and Summary (prepared by the Attorney General), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1
- Proposition 45: Analysis by the Legislative Analyst, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-4
- Proposition 45: Arguments and rebuttals, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 5-6
- Proposition 45: Text of Proposed Law, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-17
- GrowSF: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- San Francisco Chamber of Commerce: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- San Francisco Green Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Democratic Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Republican Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of California: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop 45: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-26 (compiled by this guide from CA Secretary of State: Proposition 45 contribution totals; data/money/ca-2026-11-p45.json, main@0dcbec8)