您的一票代表甚麼
兩個橢圓形都刻意留空。由您自己決定。
限制選民提高當地政府服務收入的能力。立法性憲法修正案。 限制選民通過選民提議的地方特別稅的能力，自 2027 年 1 月1 日起，將批准此類選票議案所需的投票比例從多數（超過 50%)提高到三分之二。財政影響：由於某些稅種的投票門檻加高，所以未來當地政府的稅收收入增加可能不如原先預期那麼多。支持者：California Taxpayers Association; Family Business Association of California; California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce 反對者：California Professional Firefighters; California Federation of Teachers; Nurse Alliance of SEIU CA.
這是官方選民指南中的原文。
如果不獲通過
為何現在出現在選票上
資金
由誰承擔費用
誰在背後
支持來自哪裡
根據背書者和出資者來定位，而非根據我們的意見。 我們如何定位提案
加州共和黨和納稅人團體Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association建議對第43號提案投贊成票，加州民主黨則建議投反對票。倡議團體GrowSF和商業團體San Francisco Chamber of Commerce也支持此提案，而勞工組織California Teachers Association和倡導良好施政的團體League of Women Voters of California則反對。支持第43號提案的委員會的最大捐款者是California Business Roundtable Issues PAC。反對此提案的委員會的最大捐款者是SEIU California State Council For Working People。 91086712111314
背書
追蹤資金
贊成主要捐款者
一名捐款者捐出此方一半以上的資金。
- California Business Roundtable Issues PACUS$1069萬
這是誰？
- Protect Prop. 13, a project of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers AssociationUS$151.3萬
- Douglas Emmett Properties, LP and affiliated entitiesUS$100萬
這是誰？
Douglas Emmett是一家房地產公司。其投資者簡報說，它在洛杉磯和檀香山擁有辦公大樓和14處公寓物業。 1
- Kilroy Realty, LPUS$100萬
這是誰？
- 1800 Capital, Inc. (Formerly - Ace Beverage Group, Inc.)US$50萬
這是誰？
- Right Path California Issues PAC, sponsored by taxpayer and business advocatesUS$40萬
- Jerry A. GreenbergUS$25萬
- Andrew SchwartzbergUS$10萬
- McCourt Partners Real Estate, LLC(Frank McCourt)US$10萬
這是誰？
- Moss Management Services, Inc.US$8.5萬
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的90%。
- 1%來自加州以外。
- 獨立開支（不受競選活動控制）：US$18萬
委員會: Yes on Prop 43 - The Local Taxpayer Protection Act, Sponsored by Homeowners, Businesses, and Taxpayers; Yes on Prop. 43, a Project of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
反對主要捐款者
- SEIU California State Council For Working PeopleUS$150.4萬
- No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic OrganizationsUS$105.4萬
這是誰？
名為「No on 39」的委員會。其名稱表示，它由護士、教師，以及非營利勞工和診所團體贊助。 1
- Service Employees International Union - SEIU Local 2015 Issues PACUS$100萬
- California Professional Firefighters Ballot Issues CommitteeUS$84.6萬
這是誰？
捐款者的說法
California Professional Firefighters 的會長在第43號提案的反對論據上簽名。該論據說，第43號提案「想讓地方選民更難將新的資金用於警察和消防等服務」。 3
- Yes on Prop 3, Sponsored by Education and Labor OrganizationsUS$59.9萬
- California Community FoundationUS$58.5萬
這是誰？
洛杉磯的慈善團體。它說，它透過捐贈和公民事務工作，努力強化洛杉磯郡的社區。 1
- Service Employees International Union Local 1021 Issues PACUS$50萬
這是誰？
SEIU Local 1021 的網站說，它代表超過60,000名工人。他們在北加州的地方政府、非營利組織、醫療保健機構和學校工作。 1
- Service Employees International Union Local 721 CTW, CLC Issues & Initiatives sponsored by service employee unionsUS$50萬
- Western States Regional Council of Carpenters Issues CommitteeUS$50萬
這是誰？
Western States Regional Council of Carpenters的一個委員會。該理事會的網站說，它代表南加州及其他九個西部州的會員。 1
- Southern California Partnership For Jobs (Nonprofit 501 (C)(6))US$50萬
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的44%。
- 1%來自加州以外。
- 獨立開支（不受競選活動控制）：US$7.8萬
委員會: Black Californians for Thriving Communities-Yes on Prop 3, No on Props 39 & 43, Sponsored by California Black Power Network Action Fund; Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund; Long Beach Against Proposition 43; No on Prop 43: Stop the Local Taxpayer Deception Act, Sponsored by Labor Organizations; Working People in Supporting of Prop 3 and in Opposition of Prop 39, 43 and 45, Sponsored by Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $180,310, mostly by: Reform California with Carl DeMaio - Ballot Measure Committee $148,862; Make California Golden: Senator Strickland's Ballot Measure Committee $14,000; Grove's Ballot Measure Committee For A Safer And Smarter California; Senator $10,500. Separate from total_raised.
- Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund (FPPC 1496598) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $2,230,062 of its $2,412,491 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (92%).
- No on Prop 43: Stop the Local Taxpayer Deception Act, Sponsored by Labor Organizations: added $1,059,000 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- NO side: $168,634 given by one committee on this side to another was counted once.
- NO side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $77,603, mostly by: Faith Votes, Sponsored by PICO California Action Fund $38,721; ACLU California Action Issues Committee $8,989; Million Voter Project Action Fund, Sponsored by Social Justice Organizations $5,299. Separate from total_raised.
- Committee totals are the Secretary of State's per-measure 'Total Reported Contributions' through 2026-10-22 (secretary of state page), plus later 24-hour reports from the Cal-Access bulk export built 2026-10-28. Donors, geography and independent expenditures come from the itemized Cal-Access filings. Contributions to committees that back several measures are credited pro rata to the share the Secretary of State assigns to this measure.
- Source cutoff: the Cal-Access export used was built 2026-10-27 (UTC) and the Secretary of State's per-measure totals run through 2026-10-22. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Money given to a committee by another committee is shown as that committee, not the money's original source (e.g. a union's issues PAC, not its members). Donor type is inferred from the name; check the filing for sponsors.
資料來源: CA Secretary of State: Proposition 43 contribution totals · Cal-Access raw campaign finance data export · FPPC Top 10 Contributors, November 2026 General Election
支持與反對的最有力論點
雙方各自最有力的論點，按其支持者的說法撰寫。兩者都不代表我們的觀點。
支持的最有力論點
支持者包括加州納稅人協會、加州家族企業協會（Family Business Association of California）和加州西班牙裔商會（California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce）。他們說，加州家庭面臨全國最高的所得稅、銷售稅和汽油稅。支持者認為，法院判決在第13號提案中製造了漏洞，讓特殊利益團體得以通過大幅加稅。他們說，地方政府在過去十年中已實施超過2,000項新稅或加稅。支持者認為，這些稅提高了食品、汽油、水電費和住房的成本。他們說，有些城市徵收的房地產轉讓稅高達6%。支持者認為，第43號提案恢復了地方特別稅的三分之二票數要求。支持者也說，它要求政府將稅款用於選民批准的特定目的。 14
反對的最有力論點
反對者包括加州專業消防員協會（California Professional Firefighters）、加州教師聯合會（California Federation of Teachers）和Nurse Alliance of SEIU California。反對者說，第43號提案不會為任何人減稅。反對者認為，它讓僅33.4%的選民就能阻止將近67%選民想要的事，因此一張反對票的份量是一張贊成票的兩倍。他們說，在華盛頓削減醫療資金之際，它會使消防站、911應急、野火安全、道路維修、學校和地方醫療保健更難獲得資金。反對者認為，它會讓一小部分少數人阻止地方建造可負擔住房的努力。他們說，在選舉中大舉花錢的企業捐款者將獲益最多。反對者認為，目前當地方選民決定如何為其社區提供資金時，是由多數決定，而第43號提案剝奪了這一點。 14
資料來源
本頁每項事實都連結至以下其中一個來源。
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 43 (en edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3, 10
- Proposition 43: Official Title and Summary (prepared by the Attorney General), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-2
- Proposition 43: Analysis by the Legislative Analyst, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 2
- Proposition 43: Arguments and rebuttals, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3-4
- Proposition 43: Text of Proposed Law, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1
- GrowSF: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- San Francisco Chamber of Commerce: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Democratic Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Republican Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of California: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Teachers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop 43: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-27 (compiled by this guide from CA Secretary of State: Proposition 43 contribution totals; data/money/ca-2026-11-p43.json, main@0dcbec8)
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 43 (zh-Hant edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026