您的一票代表甚麼
如果不獲通過
不獲通過則一切維持不變
如果提案F未獲通過，市府現行規定維持不變。市長不能調動《市憲章》所設部門的職責，而大部分這類部門不能設有副市長。部門的理事會或委員會通常可以免任其主管。 3
為何現在出現在選票上
資金
市主計官說，提案F對政府開支的影響將很小，具體程度目前無法確定。市主計官估計每名副市長平均每年的費用約為25萬美元。合併的費用或節省取決於計劃。舉例來說，市主計官引述2022-23年度的一次合併，估計在第一年節省了350萬美元。 4
由誰承擔費用
誰在背後
如何列入選票: 市民聯署
選民簽署連署書，將提案F列入選票。它需要53,076個有效簽名，相當於其連署通知公布時登記選民的10%。選務處於2026年7月23日確認了連署書。 5
支持來自哪裡
根據背書者和出資者來定位，而非根據我們的意見。 我們如何定位提案
提案F獲得溫和派聯盟團體GrowSF、TogetherSF Action（現稱Blueprint SF）和San Francisco Chamber of Commerce，以及SPUR和YIMBY Action的支持。反對提案F的有進步派聯盟團體San Francisco League of Pissed Off Voters和Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club，以及League of Women Voters of San Francisco和San Francisco Women's Political Committee。三藩市民主黨和三藩市共和黨都建議投贊成票。Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee的最大捐款者是Michael Moritz和Christian Larsen；沒有任何反對提案F的委員會申報過捐款。 13911101214
背書
追蹤資金
贊成主要捐款者
- Michael MoritzUS$309.3萬
這是誰？
- Christian LarsenUS$148.8萬
這是誰？
- Chris Larsen - Wikipedia
- SF-based crypto firm gave $5M to Trump’s controversial ballroom project | The San Francisco Standard
- Surprise, Lurie’s charter reform campaign is raking it in | The San Francisco Standard
- Lurie’s $13.5M campaign to clean up City Hall adds Newsom to its corner | The San Francisco Standard
- Official ballot question, Proposition F (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 100
- Lyna LamUS$100萬
這是誰？
- John PritzkerUS$100萬
- Emerson Collective LLC(Diedra Nelson)US$55萬
這是誰？
- L. John Doerr IIIUS$50萬
- John WolthuisUS$50萬
- Dagmar DolbyUS$50萬
這是誰？
- Patrick CollisonUS$50萬
- Michael SeibelUS$45萬
這是誰？
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的52%。
- 22%來自三藩市以外。
- 2%來自加州以外。
- 獨立開支（不受競選活動控制）：US$2.8萬
委員會: Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee)
- Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee): includes $300,000 of 24-hour late contributions (Form 497) dated after its latest Form 460 period ended 2026-10-17.
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $27,590, mostly by: GrowSF Voter Guide $21,768; SPUR - San Francisco Bay Area Planning & Urban Research Association $5,823. These are separate from, and not included in, total_raised.
- Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee) is a multi-measure committee (also: Yes on D, Yes on E). Its filings don't divide money by measure, so its full total and donors are shown on every measure it covers; do not add the measures' totals together.
- No opposing committee has filed campaign statements for this measure as of this refresh.
- Totals are contributions reported on Form 460 (Schedule A monetary, C non-monetary, loans) plus Form 497 late reports, from Jan 2025 or the committee's 2026 start; amended filings replace the original. Unitemized gifts under $100 are in totals but not in donor lists or geography shares. Outside-SF/CA shares use itemized gifts only.
- Source cutoff: the SF Ethics Commission data on DataSF was loaded 2026-10-27 and includes filings received through 2026-10-26. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Committees from the June 2, 2026 election (Props A–D on business taxes, term limits and the earthquake bond) are not counted. See pipeline/config/money_committees.yaml for each exclusion.
資料來源: SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w) · SF Ethics Commission campaign finance summary totals (DataSF 9ggq-m8hp) · SF Ethics Commission campaign filers (DataSF 4c8t-ngau)
相關及互相競爭的提案
支持與反對的最有力論點
雙方各自最有力的論點，按其支持者的說法撰寫。兩者都不代表我們的觀點。
支持的最有力論點
支持者包括羅偉市長（Daniel Lurie）、市議會主席Rafael Mandelman和前市主計官Ben Rosenfield。他們說，各部門現在各自為政，而不是作為一個協調的政府運作。他們說，這個制度保護內部人士。他們說，過去十年有六名部門主管因貪腐被起訴或調查。他們說，當謀取私利的行為曝光，或部門主管無法勝任工作時，市長目前只能聘任和免任少數部門主管。他們認為，讓市長聘任和免任其中大部分人，能建立清晰的問責關係。他們說，組織更完善的部門將帶來更快的許可證審批和更乾淨的街道。他們說，市議會的多數可以否決任何重組。他們也說，道德委員會和警察監督機構將保持獨立。 6
資料來源
本頁每項事實都連結至以下其中一個來源。
- Official ballot question, Proposition F (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 100
- Vote threshold for Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 100
- Ballot Simplification Council digest of Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 100-101
- Controller's Statement on Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 101
- How Proposition F got on the ballot (Dept. of Elections), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 101
- Proponent's and opponent's arguments and rebuttals on Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 102-103
- Legal text of Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 201-220
- Legal text of Proposition A, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 148-181
- SPUR: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of San Francisco: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- YIMBY Action: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- San Francisco Women's Political Committee: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop F: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-23 (compiled by this guide from SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w); data/money/sf-2026-11-f.json, main@0dcbec8)
- Official ballot question, Proposition F (zh-Hant edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026