您的一票代表什么
如果不获通过
为何现在出现在选票上
资金
由谁承担费用
谁在背后
如何列入选票: 市民联署
选民签署联署书，将提案E列入选票。它需要53,076个有效签名，相当于其连署通知公布时登记选民的10%。选务处于2026年7月23日确认了联署书。 5
支持来自哪里
根据背书者和出资者来定位，而非根据我们的意见。 我们如何定位提案
提案E获得温和派联盟团体GrowSF、TogetherSF Action（现称Blueprint SF）和San Francisco Chamber of Commerce，以及SPUR和YIMBY Action的支持。反对提案E的有进步派联盟团体San Francisco League of Pissed Off Voters、Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club和Democratic Socialists of America, San Francisco，以及League of Women Voters of San Francisco和Small Business Forward。旧金山民主党和旧金山共和党都建议投赞成票。Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee的最大捐款者是Michael Moritz和Christian Larsen；没有任何反对提案E的委员会申报过捐款。 141113121015
背书
追踪资金
赞成主要捐款者
- Michael MoritzUS$309.3万
这是谁？
- Christian LarsenUS$148.8万
这是谁？
- Chris Larsen - Wikipedia
- SF-based crypto firm gave $5M to Trump’s controversial ballroom project | The San Francisco Standard
- Surprise, Lurie’s charter reform campaign is raking it in | The San Francisco Standard
- Lurie’s $13.5M campaign to clean up City Hall adds Newsom to its corner | The San Francisco Standard
- Official ballot question, Proposition E (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 94
- Lyna LamUS$100万
这是谁？
- John PritzkerUS$100万
- Emerson Collective LLC(Diedra Nelson)US$55万
这是谁？
- L. John Doerr IIIUS$50万
- John WolthuisUS$50万
- Dagmar DolbyUS$50万
这是谁？
- Patrick CollisonUS$50万
- Michael SeibelUS$45万
这是谁？
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的52%。
- 22%来自旧金山以外。
- 2%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$2万
委员会: Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee)
- Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee): includes $300,000 of 24-hour late contributions (Form 497) dated after its latest Form 460 period ended 2026-10-17.
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $20,334, mostly by: GrowSF Voter Guide $14,512; SPUR - San Francisco Bay Area Planning & Urban Research Association $5,823. These are separate from, and not included in, total_raised.
- Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee) is a multi-measure committee (also: Yes on D, Yes on F). Its filings don't divide money by measure, so its full total and donors are shown on every measure it covers; do not add the measures' totals together.
- No opposing committee has filed campaign statements for this measure as of this refresh.
- Totals are contributions reported on Form 460 (Schedule A monetary, C non-monetary, loans) plus Form 497 late reports, from Jan 2025 or the committee's 2026 start; amended filings replace the original. Unitemized gifts under $100 are in totals but not in donor lists or geography shares. Outside-SF/CA shares use itemized gifts only.
- Source cutoff: the SF Ethics Commission data on DataSF was loaded 2026-10-27 and includes filings received through 2026-10-26. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Committees from the June 2, 2026 election (Props A–D on business taxes, term limits and the earthquake bond) are not counted. See pipeline/config/money_committees.yaml for each exclusion.
资料来源: SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w) · SF Ethics Commission campaign finance summary totals (DataSF 9ggq-m8hp) · SF Ethics Commission campaign filers (DataSF 4c8t-ngau)
相关及互相竞争的提案
支持与反对的最有力论点
双方各自最有力的论点，按其支持者的说法撰写。两者都不代表我们的观点。
支持的最有力论点
支持者包括罗伟市长、市议会主席Rafael Mandelman和前市主计官Ben Rosenfield。他们说，市府每年批出超过50亿美元的合同，却缺乏足够的监督。他们说，一个合同程序的成本可能超过2.5万美元，而基本的采购要花上数年时间。他们说，调查人员在5年内揭发了6名部门主管经营合同舞弊计划，其中一些人已入狱。他们说，一名专业的市行政官将制定清晰、透明的规则，让合同交给最能胜任工作的人，而不是关系最好的人。他们指出，市长或市议会多数仍然可以在60天内否决拟议的变更。 6
反对的最有力论点
官方反对论据由Larry S. Marso撰写。Marso说，罗伟把权力制衡视为敌人，并试图通过提案D、E和F集中权力。Marso说，提案E提高了须经市议员批准的合同金额。Marso认为，如果市长带领自己所属的政党走向财政纪律，并把最具意识形态色彩的成员逐出市议会，市长想达成的大部分目标都可以通过一般立法完成，并说市长筹集了数百万美元聘请付费的签名收集员来改写《市宪章》。没有人提交付费的反对论据。根据摘要，市议会和市长只能批准或否决市行政官的合同法规；如果两者在60天内都没有采取行动，这些法规即告通过。市议会对主要涉及工资、安全、本地企业或劳工的采购法律的权力维持不变。 673
资料来源
本页每项事实都连结至以下其中一个来源。
- Official ballot question, Proposition E (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 94
- Vote threshold for Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 94
- Ballot Simplification Council digest of Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 94-95
- Controller's Statement on Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 95
- How Proposition E got on the ballot (Dept. of Elections), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 95
- Proponent's and opponent's arguments and rebuttals on Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 96-97
- Paid arguments on Proposition E (not checked for accuracy by any official body), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 98-99
- Legal text of Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 193-201
- Legal text of Proposition A, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 148-181
- KQED Voter Guide: Prop E (supporters and opponents listed)
- SPUR: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of San Francisco: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- YIMBY Action: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop E: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-23 (compiled by this guide from SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w); data/money/sf-2026-11-e.json, main@0dcbec8)