您的一票代表甚麼
如果不獲通過
為何現在出現在選票上
資金
由誰承擔費用
誰在背後
如何列入選票: 市民聯署
選民簽署連署書，將提案E列入選票。它需要53,076個有效簽名，相當於其連署通知公布時登記選民的10%。選務處於2026年7月23日確認了連署書。 5
支持來自哪裡
根據背書者和出資者來定位，而非根據我們的意見。 我們如何定位提案
提案E獲得溫和派聯盟團體GrowSF、TogetherSF Action（現稱Blueprint SF）和San Francisco Chamber of Commerce，以及SPUR和YIMBY Action的支持。反對提案E的有進步派聯盟團體San Francisco League of Pissed Off Voters、Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club和Democratic Socialists of America, San Francisco，以及League of Women Voters of San Francisco和Small Business Forward。三藩市民主黨和三藩市共和黨都建議投贊成票。Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee的最大捐款者是Michael Moritz和Christian Larsen；沒有任何反對提案E的委員會申報過捐款。 141113121015
背書
追蹤資金
贊成主要捐款者
- Michael MoritzUS$309.3萬
這是誰？
- Christian LarsenUS$148.8萬
這是誰？
- Chris Larsen - Wikipedia
- SF-based crypto firm gave $5M to Trump’s controversial ballroom project | The San Francisco Standard
- Surprise, Lurie’s charter reform campaign is raking it in | The San Francisco Standard
- Lurie’s $13.5M campaign to clean up City Hall adds Newsom to its corner | The San Francisco Standard
- Official ballot question, Proposition E (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 94
- Lyna LamUS$100萬
這是誰？
- John PritzkerUS$100萬
- Emerson Collective LLC(Diedra Nelson)US$55萬
這是誰？
- L. John Doerr IIIUS$50萬
- John WolthuisUS$50萬
- Dagmar DolbyUS$50萬
這是誰？
- Patrick CollisonUS$50萬
- Michael SeibelUS$45萬
這是誰？
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的52%。
- 22%來自三藩市以外。
- 2%來自加州以外。
- 獨立開支（不受競選活動控制）：US$2萬
委員會: Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee)
- Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee): includes $300,000 of 24-hour late contributions (Form 497) dated after its latest Form 460 period ended 2026-10-17.
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $20,334, mostly by: GrowSF Voter Guide $14,512; SPUR - San Francisco Bay Area Planning & Urban Research Association $5,823. These are separate from, and not included in, total_raised.
- Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee) is a multi-measure committee (also: Yes on D, Yes on F). Its filings don't divide money by measure, so its full total and donors are shown on every measure it covers; do not add the measures' totals together.
- No opposing committee has filed campaign statements for this measure as of this refresh.
- Totals are contributions reported on Form 460 (Schedule A monetary, C non-monetary, loans) plus Form 497 late reports, from Jan 2025 or the committee's 2026 start; amended filings replace the original. Unitemized gifts under $100 are in totals but not in donor lists or geography shares. Outside-SF/CA shares use itemized gifts only.
- Source cutoff: the SF Ethics Commission data on DataSF was loaded 2026-10-27 and includes filings received through 2026-10-26. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Committees from the June 2, 2026 election (Props A–D on business taxes, term limits and the earthquake bond) are not counted. See pipeline/config/money_committees.yaml for each exclusion.
資料來源: SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w) · SF Ethics Commission campaign finance summary totals (DataSF 9ggq-m8hp) · SF Ethics Commission campaign filers (DataSF 4c8t-ngau)
相關及互相競爭的提案
支持與反對的最有力論點
雙方各自最有力的論點，按其支持者的說法撰寫。兩者都不代表我們的觀點。
支持的最有力論點
支持者包括羅偉市長、市議會主席Rafael Mandelman和前市主計官Ben Rosenfield。他們說，市府每年批出超過50億美元的合約，卻缺乏足夠的監督。他們說，一個合約程序的成本可能超過2.5萬美元，而基本的採購要花上數年時間。他們說，調查人員在5年內揭發了6名部門主管經營合約舞弊計劃，其中一些人已入獄。他們說，一名專業的市行政官將訂立清晰、透明的規則，讓合約交給最能勝任工作的人，而不是關係最好的人。他們指出，市長或市議會多數仍然可以在60天內否決擬議的變更。 6
反對的最有力論點
官方反對論據由Larry S. Marso撰寫。Marso說，羅偉把權力制衡視為敵人，並試圖透過提案D、E和F集中權力。Marso說，提案E提高了須經市議員批准的合約金額。Marso認為，如果市長帶領自己所屬的政黨走向財政紀律，並把最具意識形態色彩的成員逐出市議會，市長想達成的大部分目標都可以透過一般立法完成，並說市長籌集了數百萬美元聘請付費的簽名收集員來改寫《市憲章》。沒有人提交付費的反對論據。根據摘要，市議會和市長只能批准或否決市行政官的合約法規；如果兩者在60天內都沒有採取行動，這些法規即告通過。市議會對主要涉及工資、安全、本地企業或勞工的採購法律的權力維持不變。 673
資料來源
本頁每項事實都連結至以下其中一個來源。
- Official ballot question, Proposition E (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 94
- Vote threshold for Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 94
- Ballot Simplification Council digest of Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 94-95
- Controller's Statement on Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 95
- How Proposition E got on the ballot (Dept. of Elections), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 95
- Proponent's and opponent's arguments and rebuttals on Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 96-97
- Paid arguments on Proposition E (not checked for accuracy by any official body), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 98-99
- Legal text of Proposition E, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 193-201
- Legal text of Proposition A, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 148-181
- KQED Voter Guide: Prop E (supporters and opponents listed)
- SPUR: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of San Francisco: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- YIMBY Action: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop E: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-23 (compiled by this guide from SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w); data/money/sf-2026-11-e.json, main@0dcbec8)
- Official ballot question, Proposition E (zh-Hant edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026