您的一票代表甚麼
如果不獲通過
不獲通過則一切維持不變
如果提案G未獲通過，公園維持現狀。日落沙丘公園（即原來的上大公路）繼續在所有時間禁止私人車輛通行。緊急車輛、政府車輛和公園接駁車仍可使用。 3
為何現在出現在選票上
資金
如果這條道路開放給私人車輛通行，市主計官估計一次性費用約為980萬美元，包括在8個路口設置交通燈的880萬美元，以及拆除公園設施和恢復路面的約75萬美元。每年費用可能增加50萬至190萬美元，包括清除沙子和重塑沙丘的約10萬至150萬美元。市主計官也預計公園平日所需職員會減少，維護工作也會減少。這會降低費用，並讓職員騰出時間做其他工作。作為參考，公園目前的職員費用約為每年30萬美元。海岸許可證和Sloat重新設計可能會增加費用。 4
由誰承擔費用
誰在背後
如何列入選票: 市民聯署
選民簽署了連署書。它需要10,615個有效簽名，相當於登記選民的2%，而選務處認定的有效簽名超過這個數目。 5
支持來自哪裡
根據背書者和出資者來定位，而非根據我們的意見。 我們如何定位提案
三藩市共和黨建議對提案G投贊成票，三藩市民主黨則建議投反對票。溫和派聯盟團體GrowSF反對此提案，SPUR、YIMBY Action和San Francisco Bay Chapter of the Sierra Club也反對。San Francisco Chamber of Commerce保持中立；TogetherSF Action（現稱Blueprint SF）、San Francisco League of Pissed Off Voters和Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club列出了此提案，但沒有表明任何立場。支持提案G的委員會的最大捐款者是Chinese American Democratic Club和Wei Selena Chu；反對此提案的委員會的最大捐款者是Jeremy Stoppelman和Laura Yakovenko。 13910111214
背書
追蹤資金
贊成主要捐款者
- Chinese American Democratic ClubUS$2.5萬
- Wei Selena ChuUS$9,900
- Lisa ArjesUS$5,000
- Sandra DratlerUS$5,000
- William OKeeffe Jr.US$4,990
- Better Housing PoliciesUS$3,800
- Peter WendellUS$3,500
- Tomasita MedalUS$3,500
- California Professional Firefighters PACUS$2,500
- California Nurses Association Political Action CommitteeUS$2,500
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的33%。
- 9%來自三藩市以外。
- 0%來自加州以外。
委員會: Yes on G, Great Highway for Everyone
反對主要捐款者
- Jeremy StoppelmanUS$40萬
這是誰？
- Laura YakovenkoUS$20萬
- Nicholas JosefowitzUS$5萬
- Friends Of Sunset DunesUS$4.3萬
- Donald J EdwardsUS$3.5萬
- Fund For A Better Future Inc.US$2.5萬
- Andrew CasteelUS$1.6萬
- Stephen DodsonUS$1萬
- Michael R GlaserUS$2,500
- Steven ChapmanUS$2,000
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的89%。
- 32%來自三藩市以外。
- 5%來自加州以外。
- 獨立開支（不受競選活動控制）：US$1.7萬
委員會: No on G, Save Sunset Dunes sponsored by Friends of Sunset Dunes
- Yes on G, Great Highway for Everyone: includes $600 of 24-hour late contributions (Form 497) dated after its latest Form 460 period ended 2026-10-17.
- No on G, Save Sunset Dunes sponsored by Friends of Sunset Dunes: includes $1,000 of 24-hour late contributions (Form 497) dated after its latest Form 460 period ended 2026-10-17.
- NO side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $16,706, mostly by: GrowSF Voter Guide $10,884; SPUR - San Francisco Bay Area Planning & Urban Research Association $5,823. These are separate from, and not included in, total_raised.
- Totals are contributions reported on Form 460 (Schedule A monetary, C non-monetary, loans) plus Form 497 late reports, from Jan 2025 or the committee's 2026 start; amended filings replace the original. Unitemized gifts under $100 are in totals but not in donor lists or geography shares. Outside-SF/CA shares use itemized gifts only.
- Source cutoff: the SF Ethics Commission data on DataSF was loaded 2026-10-27 and includes filings received through 2026-10-26. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Committees from the June 2, 2026 election (Props A–D on business taxes, term limits and the earthquake bond) are not counted. See pipeline/config/money_committees.yaml for each exclusion.
資料來源: SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w) · SF Ethics Commission campaign finance summary totals (DataSF 9ggq-m8hp) · SF Ethics Commission campaign filers (DataSF 4c8t-ngau)
支持與反對的最有力論點
雙方各自最有力的論點，按其支持者的說法撰寫。兩者都不代表我們的觀點。
資料來源
本頁每項事實都連結至以下其中一個來源。
- Official ballot question, Proposition G (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 108
- Vote threshold for Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 108
- Ballot Simplification Council digest of Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 108
- Controller's Statement on Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 108-109
- How Proposition G got on the ballot (Dept. of Elections), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 109
- Proponent's and opponent's arguments and rebuttals on Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 110-111
- Paid arguments on Proposition G (not checked for accuracy by any official body), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 112-123
- Legal text of Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 220-222
- TogetherSF Action (now Blueprint SF): recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- SPUR: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- YIMBY Action: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- KQED Voter Guide: Prop G (supporters and opponents listed)
- How endorsers line up on Prop G: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-22 (compiled by this guide from SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w); data/money/sf-2026-11-g.json, main@0dcbec8)
- Official ballot question, Proposition G (zh-Hant edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026